Background: Previous studies have shown that embryo DONATION can be a successful treatment for infertile couples, however the willingness of Dutch couples to donate or accept EMBRYOS was unknown. The aim of this article is to describe the protocol and results for altruistic embryo DONATION of the only embryo bank in the Netherlands. Materials and Methods: This is a descriptive study. Since 2011, donated cryo-EMBRYOS from couples that have undergone in vitro-fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatments, are being stored in our embryo bank. The majority of the donated EMBRYOS were frozen on day 3 or 4 by slow freezing techniques. We perform a thorough medical and psychological screening of donor couples and recipients, according to the protocol drawn up in close collaboration with the Dutch Ministry of Health. Results: Up to June 2021, 54 women have received EMBRYOS from our embryo bank, all single embryo transfers. While the clinical pregnancy rate in ‘ unknown’ embryo DONATIONs was relatively high (25. 3%), the live birth rate shows limited success (12. 6%), partly due to high pregnancy loss through miscarriage. In known DONATION procedures, the recipients tend to undergo more procedures, depending on the number of donated cryo-EMBRYOS. Twentyeight women received EMBRYOS from known donors, with a clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer of 24%, and live birth rate of 14%. In total, 82 recipients were granted donated cryo-EMBRYOS, twenty had an ongoing pregnancy (24. 4%), nineteen of whom have given birth to a healthy child (23%). Conclusion: Altruistic embryo DONATION of EMBRYOS appears to be satisfying for the donors, as they are not obliged to destroy their EMBRYOS, but instead help others build a family. Although success rates are still limited, partly due to the relatively high miscarriage rates and inferior freezing techniques, to this date nineteen out of 82 recipients have given birth to a healthy child.

So far, more than 2 million babies have been born worldwide through assisted reproductive technologies (ART). For many couples there is no treatment except joining a third party to the family. Recently, embryo DONATION law has been approved by Iran’s parliament and now it is legal in Iran. But there is a misunderstanding in the source of EMBRYOS: from surplus frozen EMBRYOS of infertile couples and sperm and egg DONATION from fertile married couples followed by DONATION of the resulting EMBRYOS. Here in this paper we discussed ethical, religious and legal aspects of these two procedures and present the advantages and disadvantages of them. Meanwhile, the new term "both gamete DONATIONs" was defined for the misplaced program instead of "embryo DONATION". In conclusion we can say: 1) Iranian law means only embryo DONATION and covers only surplus EMBRYOS from other infertile couples and not both gamete DONATION. 2) As gamete DONATION is practiced in Iran upon decrees of clergy leaders, there is nothing against both gamete DONATIONs. 3) There are so many ethical, legal and religious questions about "both gamete DONATION" to be answered. 4) Ethical and religious questions are very fewer about "embryo DONATION" comparing to "both gamete DONATION" program, and 5) Embro sharing is a good way for DONATION of fresh EMBRYOS.

In Iranian law there are many legal institution such as debt transfer, release and debt DONATION to release debtor to pay. Despite some similarities, there are fundamental differences. The writers have paid little attention to the concept of debt DONATION. Some jurists believe that this gift is not correct because the debt could not be delivered. They believe that DONATION of debt takes place in the form of release and the result is the same in both. On this same basis, they also consider debt DONATION to third party as invalid. However, another group argues that the delivery is not only physical. Overpowering the gift is also important and occurs in DONATION of debt. In addition, if the subject of DONATION is at disposal of receiver, there is no need for new delivery. In debt DONATION, debt is at the disposal of debtor. Hence, there is no need for delivery. In this opinion, the initial effect of release differs from debt DONATION; debt DONATION leads to ownership of debt and the release leads to debt collapse and this difference leads to different effects. When the debt is donated to a third party, because, after debt DONATION, the third party becomes the owner of debt and can refer to debtor, delivery has taken place. In French law, a debt transfer can also be done for free; in this case, it will be possible to apply rules of DONATION to it.

in the law of EMBRYOS DONATION that was approved for artificial insemination or treatment of infertile couples, the legitimacy of fertility was subjected to observance of the Islamic criteria of artificial insemination without clearing and specifying them. with due attention that the Artificial inseminators are physicians and not specialist of Islamic law, it is necessary that the lawmaker revised the law and Select a method that is in accordance with Islamic prerequisite criteria and also determine the Islamic criteria of artificial insemination accurately which the most important of them are the sanctity of receiving woman’s uterus, the observance of Iddah during the pregnancy and the necessity of perseverance the child's parentage that shaping his or her identity.